18+ · Offer terms
18+. Offer wording, rating and review count are reported by the partner and shown as received. Availability and terms depend on where you are. Gambling carries financial risk.
18+. Offer wording, rating and review count are reported by the partner and shown as received. Availability and terms depend on where you are. Gambling carries financial risk.
Ten games carry these two names, and their published returns run from 94.00% to 98.00% while their win caps run from 2,000x to 150,000x. A figure quoted for \u201cMoney Train\u201d without a number after it is almost certainly describing a different game from the one you are playing.
Version-bound figures: every number below is the value checked in the build named beside it. Record the RTP your own client shows rather than assuming these apply.
Relax Gaming has built two related families. Money Train titles are line games with a bonus feature; Money Cart titles are bonus-only games built from the Money Train feature itself. They share symbols and vocabulary, which is exactly why their numbers get mixed up.
The spread is not small. Across the ten, the checked base return runs from 94.00% to 98.00%, and the round cap runs from 2,000x the bet to 150,000x. Those are different games in any practical sense, and a search result that shortens all of them to "Money Train" is throwing away the part that matters.
There is a second reason to be careful. These figures belong to the configuration that was inspected, and suppliers can ship alternative builds to different markets. A number checked in one package is evidence about that package, not a universal property of the title.
| Game | Checked base RTP | Buy route | Win cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Money Train | 96.20% | 98% at 80x cost | 20,000x |
| Money Train 2 | 96.40% | 98.00% at 100x cost | 50,000x |
| Money Train 3 | 96.10% | 96.50% | 100,000x |
| Money Train 4 | 96.10% | 96.50% | 150,000x |
| Money Train 5 | 96.10% | — | 50,000x / 100,000x |
| Money Train Origins Dream Drop | 94.00% | — | 10,000x |
All six run on 40 paylines in the builds we checked. The pattern worth noticing is that the highest cap does not sit with the highest return: Money Train 4 pairs the series' largest ceiling with a 96.10% base, while the original pairs a slightly higher 96.20% with the smallest cap of the six.
Money Train Origins Dream Drop is the outlier and the one most likely to surprise someone. Its 94.00% is the lowest figure in either family, and the game also carries six jackpot tiers, which is where the rest of the model goes. A Dream Drop edition is a different product from the numbered instalment it resembles.
| Game | Checked RTP | Coin cap | Equivalent cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Money Cart | 98.00% | 20,000 coins | 2,000x bet |
| Money Cart 2 | 98.00% | 50,000 coins | 5,000x bet |
| Money Cart 3 | 96.00% | 100,000 coins | 10,000x bet |
| Money Cart 4 | 96.00% | 150,000 coins | 15,000x bet |
This family splits cleanly in half. The first two titles were checked at 98.00%, equivalent to a 2% theoretical house edge. The third and fourth were checked at 96.00%, equivalent to 4%. That is a doubling of the theoretical edge between Money Cart 2 and Money Cart 3, and it is invisible if you only read the game names.
Caps move the other way, rising steadily from 20,000 coins to 150,000 coins. Note that these are expressed in coins first and then as a multiple of the selected bet, which is how the help states them. The two expressions describe the same ceiling.
People search for a game plus a number because they half-remember a figure. The trouble is that 96 matches several of these titles and distinguishes none of them: Money Train 3, 4 and 5 were all checked at 96.10%, Money Cart 3 and 4 at 96.00%, and the original Money Train at 96.20%.
A partial number therefore cannot identify a game, and it cannot confirm your own table either. The figure that applies to you is the one in the help panel of the client you have open, which is why every page above records the version the value was read from.
Open the game's own help or information panel and find the theoretical return statement. Compare it against the figure here for the same title. If they match, you are on the configuration we inspected; if they do not, your operator has deployed a different build and the help panel wins.
Then read the cap in the same place, because a cap can be stated as coins, as a multiple of the bet, or both. If your operator also publishes a maximum payout in its terms, compare the two and assume the lower one binds you.
Finally, keep buy routes separate. A purchase price and its return are a different model from base play, and in this family the gap can run either way: Money Train 2's buy was checked above its base at 98.00%, while Money Train 3 and 4 assign 96.50% to their purchase routes. Our note on feature purchase mathematics covers why those two numbers should never be averaged.
A theoretical return describes an average over an extremely large number of rounds. It is not a session forecast, not a promise, and not a figure that becomes more reliable the longer you play in one evening. Our guide to theoretical return works through that gap, and maximum win versus cashout limits explains why a game cap and an operator limit are separate numbers.
A high cap is also not value. A 150,000x ceiling and a 96.10% return describe different properties of the same game, and the first does not compensate for the second. Comparing two titles by cap alone will mislead you in this family more than most.
Each figure above is taken from our own review of that title, where it was read from the supplier's official help or demo for the build named on the page: Money Train and Money Train 2 from current configurations, Money Train 3 from help v1.1.4, Money Train 4 from v1.0.11, Money Train 5 and Money Train Origins Dream Drop from v1.0.7, Money Cart from v2.0.2, Money Cart 3 from v1.0.7 and Money Cart 4 from v1.0.8.
Not verified here: your operator's deployed configuration, any market-specific alternative build, operator maximum payout limits, bet ranges, or availability for a New Zealand account. None of these figures is universal or guaranteed, and this page does not recommend a game or a wager.
Roulette on a physical floor and roulette on a remote platform may look similar to a player, but their premises, operator records and regulatory frameworks differ. The brand displayed above the game is not sufficient evidence that the same licence covers both services.
When checking a claim, write down the product, operator entity, jurisdiction and date. An overseas licence claim is not equivalent to a New Zealand online register entry. An affiliate button is a commercial handoff and cannot provide the legal evidence missing from the underlying record.
A land-based visit asks about the entrance, accepted ID, operating hours and journey home. An online service asks different questions about country eligibility, account verification, payments, bonus conditions and the current licensed record. Transferring a physical venue’s familiar name or age label into an online advertisement can obscure those differences.
A useful side-by-side guide therefore compares where evidence comes from, not which setting is more likely to produce a win. Neither a physical visit nor an online bonus should be treated as income. If gambling is causing concern, the support pathway matters more than choosing another format.
| Question | Check | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | Physical venue and operator | Remote provider and platform. |
| Status source | Venue and operator instruments | Online framework and official register when published. |
| Practical access | Entrance, ID and transport | Country, account and operator conditions. |
| Commercial claim | Not proof of current operations | Not proof of eligibility or licensing. |

22Bet is the operator this guide links to. Open the offer page to read the current bonus and its terms before you deposit.
Play at 22Bet